Sunday, June 9, 2019
Advice Sofia and her father on the legal position Essay
Advice Sofia and her father on the legal position - Essay ExampleIn the course of valuation the expert came crosswise the 1885 cent, but to the dismay Sofias father declared it to be counterfeit. (This was later confirmed by a coin expert at Sothebys who said it was worthless.)Sofia sideboarded to Hockley Coins to demand the return of her money. David Jones apologised for the embarrassment caused but claimed that he sold the coin in good faith, believing it to be genuine, as he could not tell that it was counterfeit he could not accept liability in the matter. He refused to return Sofias money and pointed to large sign- No refunds/Credit Notes only- in the shop. Sofia refused a credit note.In put to advise Sofia and her father with regard to their legal position it is necessary to consider the justice in relation to refutation and examine the elements that they would need to prove in order to succeed in such a claim. The starting point is to refer to the Misrepresentation Act 196 7 in order to determine whether either political party might be able to substantiate a claim under these provisions. In order for the court to decide that a misrepresentation has occurred they will withdraw proof that the person claiming misrepresentation was bring forth into entering into the contract as a direct result of comments do by the other party.In law the courts will consider that a misrepresentation has occurred if the plaintiff can show that the respondent made a false statement about the product which induced them into entering into that contract. Historically the courts have recognised three distinct forms of misrepresentation, fraudulent misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation1 and innocent misrepresentation2. When determining damages it is important for the court to distinguish whether the misrepresentation has been fraudulent, negligent or innocent.The courts will determine that a fraudulent misrepresentation has occurred if it can be proven that the pers on making the representation to the plaintiff made the statement without belief
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.